Kazantsev Dmitry A.

The Republic of Korea has extensive experience in transforming the procurement system. This experience is valuable because it allows us to see in practice, not only in theory, the effectiveness of specific procurement tools and the limitations of their use. Korean experiments in the field of procurement regulation are an example of a systematic search for balance and rejection of extremes. And therefore, the study of this experience is relevant for any state interested in developing its public procurement system.

The involvement of artificial intelligence technologies in economic relations requires research into the regulation and application of these technologies. This issue is especially relevant for the procurement sector. In procurement there are economic and technological prerequisites for the introduction of such technologies. This article is about how in demand neural networks are in the current procurement paradigm. And what kind of regulatory work will be required to make the use of neural networks for preparing and conducting procurement legal?

The practice of using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in business relations makes it relevant to regulate the procedure for their use. One of the most promising areas for the introduction of innovative technologies today is public procurement. These procurements have long been carried out electronically. However, before introducing AI technologies, we must study the limitations of their use and identify promising areas for applying AI in procurement business processes. At the same time, it is important to avoid both the extreme of completely denying the applied significance of AI and the extreme of widespread implementation of AI as a panacea. The search for balance is focused on areas in which AI does not replace a person, but at the same time relieves him of the costs associated with routine operations. This allows a person to deal with expert issues, thereby increasing the efficiency of the authorized specialist.

Change of terms of contracts for supply for state and municipal needs in Russia today is generally prohibited (except for cases expressly provided for by law). In these conditions, even a justified change of the contract is often impossible. This, in turn, makes it impossible to supply high-quality goods, works and services for state and municipal needs. To solve this problem, the range of situations in which changes are allowed is regularly expanded. However, the solution to the problem of a justified change of the contract without excessive administrative procedures is impossible without a transition from casual regulation to systemic regulation of this issue.